This thought is bothering me all day today as I have a compulsion to be obsessive thinking towards this disease,I am thinking that given the theory that most research agrees that the pathognomonic symptom of an IC bladder is a problematic lining which is most if I am not mistaken Ic bladders lining is defective,leaky or ruptured, i thought that hydrodistention in cystoscopy would create more harm than good in determining the diagnosis. If in the process of the distention that is when they can accurately say it is IC,I sure do not want it more aggravated by creating more ruptures in it.But on the other hand I am thinking that hydro maybe give the bladder muscles a stretch it needs or the only way to accurately determine the disease or the extent of the disease,so I am puzzled whether hydro is any good as an adjunct to an accurate diagnosis or a possible treatment to this disease or aggravates the lining condition.
Another annoying thought I can't get rid of......
Another annoying thought I can't get rid of......
Comment