Okay, I'll be giving in bits and pieces many of the tidbits that we gathered at the conference last week. But, here's a kicker. If you recall, last Spring during the IC Diagnostic conference in Japan, it was decided that IC would be called IC/CPPS. In otherwords, that IC would be considered a chronic pelvic pain syndrome.
Now, to make the issue yet more confusing, that decision was apparently changed last week and now IC will be considered a painful bladder syndrome. Thus, you will soon see it listed as IC/PBS.
So much for consistency, eh??? I'm not sure why this happened except that when the European Congress occurred, they decided to call it a painful bladder syndrome. I think that the US chose to make this transition to be more in harmoney with the European researchers!
So, whether it be IC/CPPS/PBS.... the good news is that the research is hopping. It would be nice to have consensus on the name, however!
Jill
Now, to make the issue yet more confusing, that decision was apparently changed last week and now IC will be considered a painful bladder syndrome. Thus, you will soon see it listed as IC/PBS.
So much for consistency, eh??? I'm not sure why this happened except that when the European Congress occurred, they decided to call it a painful bladder syndrome. I think that the US chose to make this transition to be more in harmoney with the European researchers!
So, whether it be IC/CPPS/PBS.... the good news is that the research is hopping. It would be nice to have consensus on the name, however!
Jill

Comment