Hi all,
I was just wondering if anyone could tell me why the interstim implant is close to being a "last resort" option? I've noticed that even for those who've had really positive epxeriences with interstim, some still always mention things like "keep in mind, this is a very serious choice, etc" in their posts. I was just curious as to why this is?
What are the possible dangers associated with it?
Sorry, I really don't know that much about it (isn't that obvious!!) and I thought it would be best to ask those who know a lot about it.
Thanks in advance,
Shelley
-----inserted by icnmgrjill on March 12, 2004 ------
Interstim is considered a last resort because that's how the FDA has set it up. If you look at the FDA approval for Interstim, it clearly says that it should not be considered until patients have tried and failed the other more conservative therapies (i.e. oral medications, etc.)
So, let's remember that Interstim is NOT a first line option for IC. It is surgery that can have major complications and/or major benefits. Just a simple review of the Medwatch database will show you the complication reports that have been filed.
I, personally, feel that interstim is certainly viable, particularly for patients with extreme frequency and/or incontinence. But, it is not approved for IC. It is not approved for pain. And, as yet, the company has not releaseed their FDA 5 year follow up study which should document surgical complications. Without that CRITICAL data, we can't really say what the long term risks are. Even with that information, it's important that every patient read about the potential benefits AND the potential risks. Further questions can be directed to me by phone if you would like to discuss this further.
Jill O.
I was just wondering if anyone could tell me why the interstim implant is close to being a "last resort" option? I've noticed that even for those who've had really positive epxeriences with interstim, some still always mention things like "keep in mind, this is a very serious choice, etc" in their posts. I was just curious as to why this is?
What are the possible dangers associated with it?
Sorry, I really don't know that much about it (isn't that obvious!!) and I thought it would be best to ask those who know a lot about it.
Thanks in advance,
Shelley
-----inserted by icnmgrjill on March 12, 2004 ------
Interstim is considered a last resort because that's how the FDA has set it up. If you look at the FDA approval for Interstim, it clearly says that it should not be considered until patients have tried and failed the other more conservative therapies (i.e. oral medications, etc.)
So, let's remember that Interstim is NOT a first line option for IC. It is surgery that can have major complications and/or major benefits. Just a simple review of the Medwatch database will show you the complication reports that have been filed.
I, personally, feel that interstim is certainly viable, particularly for patients with extreme frequency and/or incontinence. But, it is not approved for IC. It is not approved for pain. And, as yet, the company has not releaseed their FDA 5 year follow up study which should document surgical complications. Without that CRITICAL data, we can't really say what the long term risks are. Even with that information, it's important that every patient read about the potential benefits AND the potential risks. Further questions can be directed to me by phone if you would like to discuss this further.
Jill O.
Comment